Which Transcript Format? TXT vs SRT vs VTT vs JSON
Four formats, four use cases, one-minute decision: TXT for reading, SRT for video subtitles, VTT for styled web captions, JSON for building things.

Four transcript formats, four different jobs. The short answer: reading it → TXT; video subtitles → SRT; styled web captions → VTT; building something → JSON. The rest of this guide is the detail behind that sentence.
The decision tree
What are you doing with this transcript?
│
├─▶ Reading / editing / sharing as a document
│ └─▶ TXT
│
├─▶ Adding subtitles to video
│ ├─▶ YouTube, Premiere, Final Cut, standard players → SRT
│ └─▶ Custom web player, styled/positioned captions → VTT
│
├─▶ Building an app or automated analysis
│ └─▶ JSON
│
└─▶ Not sure → download more than one and keep options openTXT: plain text
Speaker-labeled paragraphs, no timing syntax. The format for human consumption — reading, editing, pasting into documents, and feeding LLM prompts: content-creation prompts work noticeably better on TXT because timestamp clutter wastes the model's attention. If you only ever use one format, it is this one.
SRT: SubRip subtitles
Numbered blocks of timecode + text. The universal subtitle currency: YouTube, Premiere, Final Cut, DaVinci, VLC, and effectively every player accept it. Also the right format whenever you need when something was said — clip cutting, quote verification, episode chapters — even if no subtitle ever ships.
VTT: WebVTT captions
SRT's web-native sibling, used by HTML5 <track> elements and web players. Adds styling, positioning, and metadata that SRT lacks. Choose it when captions render in a browser you control; choose SRT everywhere else — and convert between the two trivially when needed (the header and timestamp punctuation differ; the content is the same).
JSON: structured data
Word-level timing, speaker attribution per segment, confidence scores — the machine-readable everything-format. For developers piping transcripts into search indexes, analytics, or apps, and for advanced LLM workflows where per-speaker analysis matters. Nobody reads JSON; everything good is built from it.
Selection by use case
| You are… | Use |
|---|---|
| Writing a blog post from an interview | TXT |
| Subtitling a YouTube video | SRT |
| Captioning video in your own web app | VTT |
| Citing quotes with timestamps | SRT (or JSON for precision) |
| Running AI analysis prompts | TXT (JSON if speaker-level) |
| Archiving for future flexibility | All of them — storage is free |
AI Prompt: Format Converter
Already have a transcript in the wrong format? The Transcript Format Converter prompt in our free AI prompts library converts between TXT, SRT, and VTT — stripping timestamps for a reading copy, or rebuilding subtitle blocks with proper line-length limits from a timestamped source. For formats with timing the source lacks (TXT → SRT), it flags that timing must come from re-transcription rather than inventing it.
The simpler path: get the formats right at the source. TranscribeBee exports TXT, SRT, DOC, and PDF from every transcription — download what today's job needs and keep the rest.

More Posts

Raw transcripts arrive with fillers, Speaker A labels, and no structure. Five steps — clean, label, timestamp, organize, repurpose — with copy-paste prompts.

Blog posts, meeting summaries, social packages, training modules, SEO series, FAQs, and executive briefs—seven prompts, each under five minutes per deliverable.
Newsletter
Join the community
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates